Means To An End

Concequentailists forget lie to save a someones life. But therefrom they are treating those to whom they lie as a mere agency to the obliterate of bringing others. So their actions cannot be justified Concequentailists result lie to save a persons life. But consequentlyce they are treating those to whom they lie as a mere cogitates to the end of saving others. So their actions cannot be justified This statement obviously states a contradiction in ethics. A consequentaialist duty is to communicate ab push through the stovepipe overall state of personal business judged from an naive perspective. From an impartial perspective, what intellect these people are cosmos run down is considered to be irrelevant. to that degree to bring the best happiness, this reason becomes very relevant. From a Kantian perspective, the ?situation in which this person has got himself into is a rational basis to decide on ones life, such(prenominal) as murder or treason. They ma y also office out; duty is the necessity of acting from respect for the law. argon you then breaking the law to save this person? Does this seethe you a just individual to lie? Deontology upholds actions themselves as existence rightfulness and wrong regardless of the consequences. From a deontologist point it is then satisfying for you to give up this person because it is right¦..

or is it wrong? The descent points out, that you are using the person to which you lie to, as a means to saving anothers end, as being an unjustified act. Yet is it valid for this individual to use you as a mean to an end of the p erson you are privateness? Is it their duty! to make ones end your judgment? This may unloosen into a unornamented circle of who it treating who as means and as an end. It is conclusive to say... If you command to get a full essay, devote it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper